| TABLESAW HEIGHT ADJUSTMENT INDEX
|
| As you can see, this isn't very complicated. The "wheel"
(protractor) shown isn't the best choice, as it indexes 1800 in both directions from zero, rather
than 3600 for a full rotation. It takes a mark or intense concentration to know location
on this particular wheel when rotation exceeds 1/2 turn. (Like a dope, I got in a hurry and installed it before I
realized that I had a problem. Thankfully, it's easy to replace!) However, protractors are everywhere, and can be found at
stores for tools, or for office, drafting, or school supplies. One simply showing 3600 in clear, readable
divisions and having about 4" diameter would be the best choice. Google this (they're everywhere): C-Thru 255 Protractor
So as to get the wheel close to the mark on the cabinet, I chose to mount a simple shaft bushing behind the height crank, to which I attached the protractor with "Household Goop" adhesive. Simple, fast, cheap. |
So What? For starters, let's acknowledge that no woodworker in his right mind (and who wants to stay that way!) is going to try to make all of his cuts with precision in thousandths. It doesn't work that way, and isn't needed most of the time. BUT - when it is needed, is sure is nice to know how! For example, let's say that you want to make a simple half-lap joint with two workpieces, so that they join with both faces flush with one another. Hmmm ... you can feel a 0.001" mismatch, and easily see slightly more than that. If the faces are off just a little, then you've a chore ahead in scraping, sanding, and cussin' until it's right. But if you can cut to depth with precision, you can hit it "dead on", and very quickly. To "feel" that joint into near -perfection so the faces are flush, you'll need to make at least 3 or 4 trial joints - unless you get really lucky - before you get it right by trial and error. Lotsa time and lotsa sawdust.Unfortunately, a step-type depth gauge only works down to eighths (0.125") or sixteenths (0.0625"), and your 3/4" stock turns out to be slightly oversized at 0.812". That's 0.0062" too thick for a depth gauge to be useful, and a 1/64 precision ruler is only good to +/- 0.015" - - it can help in the range of 15 thousandths, but you need to resolve 3 thousandths (half out of each piece) in order to make the joint faces come out flush. Gauge and ruler are great most of the time, but they can't fill the bill for this job. Worse, absolute measurement of blade height with some precision device may be - is most likely to be - misleading because the throat plate reference surface probably isn't within 0.001" of actual table height, and commercial blade tolerances may induce some wobble or may combine with a slightly undersized arbor to give you some vertical oscillation of the blade(if an arbor wasn't custom-machined to tight specs and retrofitted to the saw, you can bet that it's not full diameter, and only the most expensive blades have precise bores) . Did you measure at the high point or the low one? Maybe somewhere in between? Who knows? For those reasons, it's easier to cancel out all of those variables and just get within spittin' distance with a ruler or depth gauge, make a test cut, and then measure and correct for the error actually delivered from the cutting operation. Good News - Measurement of degrees of rotation for the height crank can give you the ability to adjust height to within less than 0.001" in a couple of seconds - do a little simple arithmetic, crank in a few degrees, and you'll hit it dead-on. The same is true for any blind cut that doesn't go through the wood. It's especially important for making curves or arches, so you can raise the blade into the wood exactly, rather than trying to fumble with lowering the wood onto a moving blade. An aside: |
| How Does It Work?
Before we get into the mechanics, let's have it understood that this is not about setting blade height perfectly the first time outta the box. It takes one close trial cut which is measured and compared to what's desired - that is, how many thousandths off is it? The rotating degree indicator will allow you to make the right correction with terrific precision and in a couple of seconds. Note the scribed line at the left in the photo. Use it to read whatever the protractor says - any degree value. The protractor will turn 3600 for every turn of the blade height adjustment crank (or wheel, or whatever makes the blade go up and down), and it makes absolutely no difference where "0" is. OK, on to methods:
Determine the actual height change for your height adjuster for ten turns (a bunch of turns increases accuracy, and the number 10 is easy to work with.) To do that, Example Now let's apply this to that goofy oversized 3/4" stock we wanted to half-lap 'way back up there:
There is the possiblity that a saw's blade adjusting mechanism isn't linear. That is to say that it will may move by differing amounts per degree of crank revolution through its full range of travel. That's vexing, but not hard to handle - we just need to do "the ten turns trick" another time or two. Let's choose the easy way. I'll share findings on my own saw, and discuss them. The raising mechanism may or not be linear, depending upon the saw's age and manufacturer. I checked mine by simply finding zero blade height with a stick, and then raising exactly 10, 20, and 30 turns. At each stop, I used the depth gauge extension on a dial caliper to measure blade height. Figuring in only "close-to" perfectly vertical measurement at the saw's highest tooth, and my own clumsiness, I estimate that the results are within about 0.015".
Now, I'm using this only for correction, not for direct setting, and I can measure rough setup within 0.060" if I'm falling down asleep...;-) So, let's say that there's a 0.060" correction needed. For 0.060 correction at .00029 per degree, I need to turn 2070Finally, let's put all those numbers into perspective by recalling that the average coat of finish is 0.003" thick. If you can get a joint to within 2-4 thousandths, ya got a good thing going. |
|
============================================================================
I hope that this has been helpful for those who care to implement the method.
Best wishes, John Popp |